“These new books share a concern with how digital media are reshaping our political and social landscape, molding art and entertainment, even affecting the methodology of scholarship and research. They examine the consequences of the fragmentation of data that the Web produces, as news articles, novels and record albums are broken down into bits and bytes; the growing emphasis on immediacy and real-time responses; the rising tide of data and information that permeates our lives; and the emphasis that blogging and partisan political Web sites place on subjectivity.
At the same time itâ€™s clear that technology and the mechanisms of the Web have been accelerating certain trends already percolating through our culture â€” including the blurring of news and entertainment, a growing polarization in national politics, a deconstructionist view of literature (which emphasizes a criticâ€™s or readerâ€™s interpretation of a text, rather than the textâ€™s actual content), the prominence of postmodernism in the form of mash-ups and bricolage, and a growing cultural relativism that has been advanced on the left by multiculturalists and radical feminists, who argue that history is an adjunct of identity politics, and on the right by creationists and climate-change denialists, who suggest that science is an instrument of leftist ideologues. […]
More people are impatient to cut to the chase, and theyâ€™re increasingly willing to take the imperfect but immediately available product over a more thoughtfully analyzed, carefully created one. Instead of reading an entire news article, watching an entire television show or listening to an entire speech, growing numbers of people are happy to jump to the summary, the video clip, the sound bite â€” never mind if context and nuance are lost in the process; never mind if itâ€™s our emotions, more than our sense of reason, that are engaged; never mind if statements havenâ€™t been properly vetted and sourced. […]
Given the constant bombardment of trivia and data that weâ€™re subjected to in todayâ€™s mediascape, itâ€™s little wonder that noisy, Manichean arguments tend to get more attention than subtle, policy-heavy ones; that funny, snarky or willfully provocative assertions often gain more traction than earnest, measured ones; and that loud, entertaining or controversial personalities tend to get the most ink and airtime.”
But are things really that bad? Thomas Crampton takes a bit of an ironical view on the matter.